The goal of these tests is to gauge how well each computer performed in providing clear, understandable guidance in those conditions. ScubaLab staff also tested computers in a bench-top compression chamber to observe screen displays, warnings and alarms in conditions not suitable for testing by divers, such as rapid ascents and missed deco stops. Onboard log data, including ease of access.Ease of accessing and usefulness of surface interval data, including no-fly time.Safety-stop performance, including alerts and timer.Usefulness and ease of accessing alternate dive screen data.Overall quality of dive data display, including selection, layout and presentation of data, with a focus on how clearly it presents critical dive information.Ease of reading screen underwater, including performance of backlight.Ease of reading screen at the surface, including in sun.General ergonomics, such as size and shape, comfort, and effectiveness of buttons, straps.Intuitiveness and ease of operation, including configuring settings.Test dives were conducted at Blue Grotto Dive Resort in Williston, Florida, where divers recorded their scores in written comments about their experiences using each computer. Test divers evaluated computers in nine categories. Our test evaluated two aspects of a computer’s performance: how easy it is to operate and understand before, during and after a dive, and an objective measure of its decompression algorithm relative to other computers in the test. Jump to ScubaLab's Testers Choice Above $450.Jump to ScubaLab's Testers Choice Under $450.Read on to see how we compared computers head-to-head, or navigate to the reviews of specific computers here: Trigger and WorkflowMax are both priced well for the small and medium sized business.Scuba Diving's independent ScubaLab team tested 11 of the newest wrist and console dive computers on the market. The main difference is that Trigger charges per user, whereas WorkflowMax charges per bracket of users. So, depending on how many users you have, a different option might be cheaper at a different point of time in your company’s growth.Ī modern user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) is Trigger’s strong point. We love Xero, but there’s only so much time you want to spend looking at Xero-copycat screens. This might be okay for accountants or tradies, but it’s not very friendly for creative agencies, PR agencies and modern consultancies who invite their clients into the project management experience. (Don’t just take our word for it, a quick search on Google shows that WorkflowMax’s design is their users’ least favourite part of their offering.)ģ. Project management (including project templates)īoth Trigger and WorkflowMax are designed for the comprehensive management of projects, for small and medium sized businesses. Kanban boards (including ability to easily switch between Kanban and list views) Both options provide project templates and collaboration options for team members and clients, so that project managers can keep on top of what work needs to be done and when, and business owners can get a better grasp on what’s really going on in their business.Ĥ. Trigger offers Kanban boards, whereas WorkflowMax does not. But the real beauty of Trigger’s Kanban board view is that you can easily switch between Kanban and Task List views for a project at any time.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |